<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2006/2007 Predictions Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epltalk.com/20062007-predictions-revisited/815/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epltalk.com/20062007-predictions-revisited/815</link>
	<description>Daily News &#38; Analysis of the English Premier League</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:23:33 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/20062007-predictions-revisited/815#comment-2014</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 10:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/05/14/20062007-predictions-revisited/#comment-2014</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t really say you *underestimated* Watford, given that you had them escaping relegation by some way and they were relegated some weeks before the end of the season... and, as has been said, you wouldn&#039;t have got the bottom three right if Liverpool had beaten Fulham, as Fulham would have gone down along with Charlton and Watford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn’t really say you *underestimated* Watford, given that you had them escaping relegation by some way and they were relegated some weeks before the end of the season… and, as has been said, you wouldn’t have got the bottom three right if Liverpool had beaten Fulham, as Fulham would have gone down along with Charlton and Watford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/20062007-predictions-revisited/815#comment-1976</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/05/14/20062007-predictions-revisited/#comment-1976</guid>
		<description>Are you a Spurs fan Gaf? 4th smacks of a heart-bet.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Otherwise not too shabby</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you a Spurs fan Gaf? 4th smacks of a heart-bet.</p>
<p>Otherwise not too shabby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/20062007-predictions-revisited/815#comment-1974</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/05/14/20062007-predictions-revisited/#comment-1974</guid>
		<description>You predicted:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;18. Fulham (16th)&lt;br/&gt;19. Sheffield United (18th)&lt;br/&gt;20. Charlton Athletic (19th)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So, this comment &quot;Meanwhile if Liverpool had beaten Fulham at Craven Cottage, I would have correctly predicted all three relegated clubs&quot; as you didn&#039;t have Watford in the bottom 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You predicted:</p>
<p>18. Fulham (16th)<br />19. Sheffield United (18th)<br />20. Charlton Athletic (19th)</p>
<p>So, this comment “Meanwhile if Liverpool had beaten Fulham at Craven Cottage, I would have correctly predicted all three relegated clubs” as you didn’t have Watford in the bottom 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
