<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2006/2007 Predictions Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epltalk.com/20062007-predictions-revisited/815/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epltalk.com/20062007-predictions-revisited/815</link>
	<description>Daily News &#38; Analysis of the English Premier League</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:54:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/20062007-predictions-revisited/815#comment-2014</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 10:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/05/14/20062007-predictions-revisited/#comment-2014</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t really say you *underestimated* Watford, given that you had them escaping relegation by some way and they were relegated some weeks before the end of the season... and, as has been said, you wouldn&#039;t have got the bottom three right if Liverpool had beaten Fulham, as Fulham would have gone down along with Charlton and Watford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t really say you *underestimated* Watford, given that you had them escaping relegation by some way and they were relegated some weeks before the end of the season&#8230; and, as has been said, you wouldn&#8217;t have got the bottom three right if Liverpool had beaten Fulham, as Fulham would have gone down along with Charlton and Watford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/20062007-predictions-revisited/815#comment-1976</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/05/14/20062007-predictions-revisited/#comment-1976</guid>
		<description>Are you a Spurs fan Gaf? 4th smacks of a heart-bet.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Otherwise not too shabby</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you a Spurs fan Gaf? 4th smacks of a heart-bet.</p>
<p>Otherwise not too shabby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/20062007-predictions-revisited/815#comment-1974</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/05/14/20062007-predictions-revisited/#comment-1974</guid>
		<description>You predicted:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;18. Fulham (16th)&lt;br/&gt;19. Sheffield United (18th)&lt;br/&gt;20. Charlton Athletic (19th)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So, this comment &quot;Meanwhile if Liverpool had beaten Fulham at Craven Cottage, I would have correctly predicted all three relegated clubs&quot; as you didn&#039;t have Watford in the bottom 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You predicted:</p>
<p>18. Fulham (16th)<br />19. Sheffield United (18th)<br />20. Charlton Athletic (19th)</p>
<p>So, this comment &#8220;Meanwhile if Liverpool had beaten Fulham at Craven Cottage, I would have correctly predicted all three relegated clubs&#8221; as you didn&#8217;t have Watford in the bottom 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
