<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Premiership Preview&#8211;19. Hull City</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epltalk.com/2791/2791/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epltalk.com/2791/2791</link>
	<description>Daily News &#38; Analysis of the English Premier League</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:03:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil..StokeCityPremierLeague</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/2791/2791#comment-19276</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil..StokeCityPremierLeague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2791/2791#comment-19276</guid>
		<description>Michael,
RE  comment #3. With the additions Hull has made this summer, there is now a clear gap in talent between Hull and Stoke.

Without being disrespectful to Hull City (as I genuinely wish them all the best for the forthcoming season) they haven&#039;t signed anyone yet that I would like Stoke to have signed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
RE  comment #3. With the additions Hull has made this summer, there is now a clear gap in talent between Hull and Stoke.</p>
<p>Without being disrespectful to Hull City (as I genuinely wish them all the best for the forthcoming season) they haven&#8217;t signed anyone yet that I would like Stoke to have signed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/2791/2791#comment-18427</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 05:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2791/2791#comment-18427</guid>
		<description>but then you are comparing...again, you make poor examples.  i wont get you to admit you are wrong, nor do i want you to.  but face it, that game isnt the biggest match in sports........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but then you are comparing&#8230;again, you make poor examples.  i wont get you to admit you are wrong, nor do i want you to.  but face it, that game isnt the biggest match in sports&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/2791/2791#comment-18398</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 23:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2791/2791#comment-18398</guid>
		<description>Todd, it doesn&#039;t mean the same thing! Can&#039;t you see that? Clubs consistently make $90 million by staying in the Premiership, but clubs that make $2 million in the Championship suddenly rocket up to $120 million by winning that playoff final! See my point yet? To that one team who makes it, it means more. They had just about nothing, and after one game, it&#039;s like they went to heaven without dying. Bad example, maybe, but I can&#039;t explain my point any other way than what I&#039;ve done so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd, it doesn&#8217;t mean the same thing! Can&#8217;t you see that? Clubs consistently make $90 million by staying in the Premiership, but clubs that make $2 million in the Championship suddenly rocket up to $120 million by winning that playoff final! See my point yet? To that one team who makes it, it means more. They had just about nothing, and after one game, it&#8217;s like they went to heaven without dying. Bad example, maybe, but I can&#8217;t explain my point any other way than what I&#8217;ve done so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/2791/2791#comment-18390</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2791/2791#comment-18390</guid>
		<description>sorry michael im afraid it doesnt make any sense to say that for a team to stay up, it doesnt mean as much than a team to be promoted.  it LITERALLY means the same thing.  im not going to argue though.  

and lastly, to say &quot;when its all said and done&quot; implies that when everything is over and we look at the situation, this will be the result.  all things considered.  after the dust blows over.  etc etc...my point is just as valid that &#039;when its all said and done&#039; theres some matches out there that will be more valuable than 120m.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry michael im afraid it doesnt make any sense to say that for a team to stay up, it doesnt mean as much than a team to be promoted.  it LITERALLY means the same thing.  im not going to argue though.  </p>
<p>and lastly, to say &#8220;when its all said and done&#8221; implies that when everything is over and we look at the situation, this will be the result.  all things considered.  after the dust blows over.  etc etc&#8230;my point is just as valid that &#8216;when its all said and done&#8217; theres some matches out there that will be more valuable than 120m.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/2791/2791#comment-18381</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2791/2791#comment-18381</guid>
		<description>Matt, that&#039;s why I said Fagan and Folan will play up top as well at times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, that&#8217;s why I said Fagan and Folan will play up top as well at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
