<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Feast to Savour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epltalk.com/a-feast-to-savour/2044/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epltalk.com/a-feast-to-savour/2044</link>
	<description>Daily News &#38; Analysis of the English Premier League</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:47:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kartik</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/a-feast-to-savour/2044#comment-9567</link>
		<dc:creator>Kartik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 00:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/a-feast-to-savour/2044#comment-9567</guid>
		<description>From the perspective of how footballers do with their respective club sides, England is the best side on the planet save perhaps Brazil. But like Brazil who despite winning recently in 1994 and 2002 the World Cup have underachieved for the most part in  World Cup and Copa America competitions (recall Spain 1982, Brazil fans?), England doesn&#039;t seem to have players who buy into international play or understand flexible tactics and approaches. 

That is why a less talented German side, who to quote Sean Ingle &quot; has no players Chelsea or Arsenal would want&quot; consistently beats England with lesser players. 

Take the national team I am most familiar with, the US. We do not have a single player except Landon Donovan strong or technical enough to make the top 50 pool players for England. I laugh when people talk about Clint Dempsey or Carlos Bocanegra. Those of us who watch the PL realize those two would have never once been called into the England team. Yet the US has a system we play which the players understand and thrive in. It is different from the system at their clubs but unlike English players they can make the adjustment without Gerrard/Lampard like conflicts. In fact the US has been successful beating Mexico 9 of the past 11 meetings despite having far inferior talent to Mexico at every position on the field and looking completely helpless and outclassed against Mexico in the first half of every match we play them in. The second half where counter attacking really kicks in is where we beat them.

This summer like a previous poster stated I fancy Romania to make noise, and perhaps also a nice little run from Poland as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the perspective of how footballers do with their respective club sides, England is the best side on the planet save perhaps Brazil. But like Brazil who despite winning recently in 1994 and 2002 the World Cup have underachieved for the most part in  World Cup and Copa America competitions (recall Spain 1982, Brazil fans?), England doesn&#8217;t seem to have players who buy into international play or understand flexible tactics and approaches. </p>
<p>That is why a less talented German side, who to quote Sean Ingle &#8221; has no players Chelsea or Arsenal would want&#8221; consistently beats England with lesser players. </p>
<p>Take the national team I am most familiar with, the US. We do not have a single player except Landon Donovan strong or technical enough to make the top 50 pool players for England. I laugh when people talk about Clint Dempsey or Carlos Bocanegra. Those of us who watch the PL realize those two would have never once been called into the England team. Yet the US has a system we play which the players understand and thrive in. It is different from the system at their clubs but unlike English players they can make the adjustment without Gerrard/Lampard like conflicts. In fact the US has been successful beating Mexico 9 of the past 11 meetings despite having far inferior talent to Mexico at every position on the field and looking completely helpless and outclassed against Mexico in the first half of every match we play them in. The second half where counter attacking really kicks in is where we beat them.</p>
<p>This summer like a previous poster stated I fancy Romania to make noise, and perhaps also a nice little run from Poland as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damir-</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/a-feast-to-savour/2044#comment-9495</link>
		<dc:creator>damir-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/a-feast-to-savour/2044#comment-9495</guid>
		<description>Nice language.
Welcome.
I don&#039;t think, except for &#039;66, that England has ever been Europe&#039;s best footballing country.
Especially not recently.

They do however have the best league in the world... filled with foreign stars. But instead of complaining about the amount for foreigners in the PL maybe the English should buckle down and try harder. Or try going across the pond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice language.<br />
Welcome.<br />
I don&#8217;t think, except for &#8216;66, that England has ever been Europe&#8217;s best footballing country.<br />
Especially not recently.</p>
<p>They do however have the best league in the world&#8230; filled with foreign stars. But instead of complaining about the amount for foreigners in the PL maybe the English should buckle down and try harder. Or try going across the pond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
