<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alan Pardew Sacking Exposes Relegation Candidates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epltalk.com/alan-pardew-sacking-exposes-relegation-candidates/495/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epltalk.com/alan-pardew-sacking-exposes-relegation-candidates/495</link>
	<description>Daily News &#38; Analysis of the English Premier League</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:52:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/alan-pardew-sacking-exposes-relegation-candidates/495#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2006/12/11/alan-pardew-sacking-exposes-relegation-candidates/#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>Agree.  It&#039;s been a pretty exciting season.  I think Watford&#039;s gone for sure.  The other two?  At present, I&#039;d go with Charlton (Bent&#039;s great, but no sustained offense) and Fulham.  West Ham fans must be going nuts with their ups-and-downs.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The interesting case to me is with Rovers.  They&#039;ve played fairly well in UEFA and have talent.  I have to wonder if UEFA&#039;s exposed them some and tired out their roster.  So much so that EPL games come around and they&#039;re just plain tired.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;...just wondering.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Kent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree.  It&#8217;s been a pretty exciting season.  I think Watford&#8217;s gone for sure.  The other two?  At present, I&#8217;d go with Charlton (Bent&#8217;s great, but no sustained offense) and Fulham.  West Ham fans must be going nuts with their ups-and-downs.  </p>
<p>The interesting case to me is with Rovers.  They&#8217;ve played fairly well in UEFA and have talent.  I have to wonder if UEFA&#8217;s exposed them some and tired out their roster.  So much so that EPL games come around and they&#8217;re just plain tired.</p>
<p>&#8230;just wondering.</p>
<p>Kent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/alan-pardew-sacking-exposes-relegation-candidates/495#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2006/12/11/alan-pardew-sacking-exposes-relegation-candidates/#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no hope for Watford, unless they buy ronaldinho or somebody of his class over the january transfer window.&lt;br/&gt; the quality is not there-simple as that.&lt;br/&gt; charlton, blackburn, fulham, man city, m&#039;boro, and west ham are all in danger.&lt;br/&gt; and, of course, sheffield united.&lt;br/&gt; these are 8 teams that will fight to avoid being in the bottom 3 come may.&lt;br/&gt; the league is very very interesting this season-in terms of relegation and top of the table battles!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no hope for Watford, unless they buy ronaldinho or somebody of his class over the january transfer window.<br /> the quality is not there-simple as that.<br /> charlton, blackburn, fulham, man city, m&#8217;boro, and west ham are all in danger.<br /> and, of course, sheffield united.<br /> these are 8 teams that will fight to avoid being in the bottom 3 come may.<br /> the league is very very interesting this season-in terms of relegation and top of the table battles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
