<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chelsea Launches Redesigned Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epltalk.com/chelsea-launches-redesigned-website/2539/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epltalk.com/chelsea-launches-redesigned-website/2539</link>
	<description>Daily News &#38; Analysis of the English Premier League</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:03:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil McThomas</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/chelsea-launches-redesigned-website/2539#comment-13706</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil McThomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/chelsea-launches-redesigned-website/2539#comment-13706</guid>
		<description>From a first glance, I&#039;d give this 5/10.  

There seems to be some effort to include some original content that takes advantage of their &#039;insider&#039; advantage.  And there&#039;s also some effort to corral the fans into producing content in the &#039;shed&#039; area. 

However, the front page is a mess.  I&#039;m literally getting a headache trying to take it all in (maybe I&#039;m just a bit fragile this morning).

For instance, there are FIVE different places to access what could be considered &#039;news&#039;.  (The top-line menu, the picture box in the top-left, the video looking control in the top-right, the most-popular list, the &#039;Stamford Bridge&#039; bit in the bottom-right).

There are also fourteen different logo&#039;s or boxes dedicted to sponsors or selling opportunities.

The navigation breaks many ground rules that will disorient the user (trying clicking the &#039;back&#039; button, some options navigate away from the main page, while others open new windows).

And while there is a notion of having the user sign-up and sign-in, there&#039;s no explanation or inducement as to why I would want to do this.

Can anyone find a Premier League site that isn&#039;t a terrible mish-mash of EVERYTHING on the home page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a first glance, I&#8217;d give this 5/10.  </p>
<p>There seems to be some effort to include some original content that takes advantage of their &#8216;insider&#8217; advantage.  And there&#8217;s also some effort to corral the fans into producing content in the &#8217;shed&#8217; area. </p>
<p>However, the front page is a mess.  I&#8217;m literally getting a headache trying to take it all in (maybe I&#8217;m just a bit fragile this morning).</p>
<p>For instance, there are FIVE different places to access what could be considered &#8216;news&#8217;.  (The top-line menu, the picture box in the top-left, the video looking control in the top-right, the most-popular list, the &#8216;Stamford Bridge&#8217; bit in the bottom-right).</p>
<p>There are also fourteen different logo&#8217;s or boxes dedicted to sponsors or selling opportunities.</p>
<p>The navigation breaks many ground rules that will disorient the user (trying clicking the &#8216;back&#8217; button, some options navigate away from the main page, while others open new windows).</p>
<p>And while there is a notion of having the user sign-up and sign-in, there&#8217;s no explanation or inducement as to why I would want to do this.</p>
<p>Can anyone find a Premier League site that isn&#8217;t a terrible mish-mash of EVERYTHING on the home page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yannick</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/chelsea-launches-redesigned-website/2539#comment-13469</link>
		<dc:creator>Yannick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/chelsea-launches-redesigned-website/2539#comment-13469</guid>
		<description>I agree, this one is much better than the last one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, this one is much better than the last one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: betsy's bolton bum baster</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/chelsea-launches-redesigned-website/2539#comment-13450</link>
		<dc:creator>betsy's bolton bum baster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/chelsea-launches-redesigned-website/2539#comment-13450</guid>
		<description>Good.  That previous Zola Version &amp; JT Version was just plain moronic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good.  That previous Zola Version &amp; JT Version was just plain moronic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/chelsea-launches-redesigned-website/2539#comment-13446</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/chelsea-launches-redesigned-website/2539#comment-13446</guid>
		<description>To be fair, it couldnt have been worse than the old one. It was the worst website of any professional club ive ever visited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, it couldnt have been worse than the old one. It was the worst website of any professional club ive ever visited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
