Comments on: CSRN 1-0 World Soccer Daily

By: Kartik

Kartik — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:05:00 +0000

Obviously I have a dog in this fight but want to concur with the anonymous comment about reminding some of you that several of CSRN’s shows are picked up by Sports Byline.

This gives CSRN an audience that isn’t measured accurately but also an inroad into the mainstream sports media and culture in the US that WSD doesn’t have.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:50:00 +0000

i didnt vote. but like csrn. nice laid back chat, some mild humor.. generally pleasant..decent guests from time to time.. wsd assults the nerves…dont like them at all. they seem very childish, maybe their market is 13 year old boys?

anyway, everyone should enjoy whatever they like…

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:29:00 +0000

My feeling on this is that both the 2Gs and Cohen are equally bad. But CSRN has some other decent shows like Divers and Cheats and the Treble. I voted for them because of those.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:32:00 +0000

To dra,

Do you not realize that Sports Byline is a national over air radio network? By proxy they have more access to listeners than Sirius.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:55:00 +0000

I too voted for CSRN but it is a matter of dumb and dumber. Dumb being the 2zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzs and dumber being Cohen and his cast of idiot sidekicks. Both networks are a joke and you wonder why soccer doesn’t gain a foothold in this nation with a cast of idiots promoting the game like Richards, Bell, Cohen, Webster and Rogers. Sounds like a pretty decent law firm though, aye?