<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EPL Talk Magazine: Your Feedback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epltalk.com/epl-talk-magazine-your-feedback/319/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epltalk.com/epl-talk-magazine-your-feedback/319</link>
	<description>Daily News &#38; Analysis of the English Premier League</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:46:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gaffer</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/epl-talk-magazine-your-feedback/319#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2006/08/29/epl-talk-magazine-your-feedback/#comment-623</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s one of the comments I received via e-mail from a reader of the EPL Talk Magazine. It&#039;s from Nathan Jacobs.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;-------------------&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I know you are going to post the survey soon on the webpage in regards to the EPL talk magazine...but I wanted to quickly give you my personal feelings on it.  I first discovered the magazine after the second issue had been published.  I was listening to the podcast for several weeks, and had finally happened to make it to the web page.  I promptly downloaded and printed the first two versions and devoured them front to back.  Since then I have desperately been waiting for issue 3, which unfortunately did not come out before my vacation. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have really enjoyed the magazine and would find it to be a tragedy if it wasn&#039;t continued, it was filled with great information, and is a valuable resource for someone that has casually followed the EPL, and is beginning to follow it more ardently.  I hope you choose to continue offering it, the insights are great, and greatly appreciated.  Thank you for your time and effort. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I also thoroughly enjoy the podcast.  Its a blast as well.  Keep up the great work.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Nathan&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;--------------------&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Cheers,&lt;br/&gt;The Gaffer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one of the comments I received via e-mail from a reader of the EPL Talk Magazine. It&#8217;s from Nathan Jacobs.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>I know you are going to post the survey soon on the webpage in regards to the EPL talk magazine&#8230;but I wanted to quickly give you my personal feelings on it.  I first discovered the magazine after the second issue had been published.  I was listening to the podcast for several weeks, and had finally happened to make it to the web page.  I promptly downloaded and printed the first two versions and devoured them front to back.  Since then I have desperately been waiting for issue 3, which unfortunately did not come out before my vacation. </p>
<p>I have really enjoyed the magazine and would find it to be a tragedy if it wasn&#8217;t continued, it was filled with great information, and is a valuable resource for someone that has casually followed the EPL, and is beginning to follow it more ardently.  I hope you choose to continue offering it, the insights are great, and greatly appreciated.  Thank you for your time and effort. </p>
<p>I also thoroughly enjoy the podcast.  Its a blast as well.  Keep up the great work.</p>
<p>Nathan</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />The Gaffer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
