<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ESPN Wants Premier League TV Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epltalk.com/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/1137/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epltalk.com/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/1137</link>
	<description>Daily News &#38; Analysis of the English Premier League</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:45:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gaffer</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/1137#comment-3305</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/12/10/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/#comment-3305</guid>
		<description>Jason,

That&#039;s a great idea for a blog post. I&#039;ll write something up on that topic in the near future. Thanks for the suggestion.

Cheers,
The Gaffer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>That’s a great idea for a blog post. I’ll write something up on that topic in the near future. Thanks for the suggestion.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
The Gaffer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/1137#comment-3288</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/12/10/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/#comment-3288</guid>
		<description>Not really the post for this comment/question, but maybe close enough: would you consider blogging a bit about the current state of options for viewing UEFA, Premier League, etc games in the states?  I am paying $15 a month for Setanta online, which is almost enough.  Am thinking about FSC, but am unlikely to convince the wife to pay $65+.mo for one channel...  What options are out there?  Would appreciate it if you could review them in one of your posts?  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really the post for this comment/question, but maybe close enough: would you consider blogging a bit about the current state of options for viewing UEFA, Premier League, etc games in the states?  I am paying $15 a month for Setanta online, which is almost enough.  Am thinking about FSC, but am unlikely to convince the wife to pay $65+.mo for one channel…  What options are out there?  Would appreciate it if you could review them in one of your posts?  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/1137#comment-3168</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/12/10/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/#comment-3168</guid>
		<description>GOL TV is using the Bundesliga as filer. Their audience is primarily Latin and they could always replace it with more South American oriented programming. However, losing LaLiga would be the death of the network. Interesting thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOL TV is using the Bundesliga as filer. Their audience is primarily Latin and they could always replace it with more South American oriented programming. However, losing LaLiga would be the death of the network. Interesting thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/1137#comment-3167</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/12/10/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/#comment-3167</guid>
		<description>The Gaffer wrote:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;Fox Soccer Channel, meanwhile, should watch the news closely as they may not be able to compete if ESPN decided to bid for the TV rights in the United States. Imagine how different FSC would be without the Premier League. It&#039;s almost unthinkable and would change the perception of the channel overnight.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;To further expand The Gaffer&#039;s hypothesis... Imagine how different GolTV might be if FSC were to raid it (again), this time for La Liga or Bundesliga to replace Premier League programming.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Or could NewsCorp even just say, &quot;Screw it!&quot; and pull the plug on FSC?  That&#039;d be one way to get Stupor Sunday Plus off the air I suppose...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Gaffer wrote:<br /><i>Fox Soccer Channel, meanwhile, should watch the news closely as they may not be able to compete if ESPN decided to bid for the TV rights in the United States. Imagine how different FSC would be without the Premier League. It’s almost unthinkable and would change the perception of the channel overnight.</i></p>
<p>To further expand The Gaffer’s hypothesis… Imagine how different GolTV might be if FSC were to raid it (again), this time for La Liga or Bundesliga to replace Premier League programming.</p>
<p>Or could NewsCorp even just say, “Screw it!” and pull the plug on FSC?  That’d be one way to get Stupor Sunday Plus off the air I suppose…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olivert</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/1137#comment-3166</link>
		<dc:creator>olivert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/12/10/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/#comment-3166</guid>
		<description>After thinking about the FT article and talking to a few other observers, I think I have figured out why George Bodenheimer spoke to the FT reporter:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ESPN, Inc. is applying the &quot;bear hug&quot; on Setanta Sports Ltd.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In my opinion, ESPN, Inc. is telling Setanta the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Either ESPN buys out Setanta now so that Setanta doesn&#039;t have to raise more cash in a capital market that has either topped or is about to top, or ESPN will roll over Setanta 1 or 2 years from now, when Setanta will have trouble raising cash to keep itself running.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I predict that ESPN, Inc. will buy out Setanta within 12-18 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After thinking about the FT article and talking to a few other observers, I think I have figured out why George Bodenheimer spoke to the FT reporter:</p>
<p>ESPN, Inc. is applying the “bear hug” on Setanta Sports Ltd.</p>
<p>In my opinion, ESPN, Inc. is telling Setanta the following:</p>
<p>Either ESPN buys out Setanta now so that Setanta doesn’t have to raise more cash in a capital market that has either topped or is about to top, or ESPN will roll over Setanta 1 or 2 years from now, when Setanta will have trouble raising cash to keep itself running.</p>
<p>I predict that ESPN, Inc. will buy out Setanta within 12-18 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eplnfl</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/1137#comment-3165</link>
		<dc:creator>eplnfl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/12/10/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/#comment-3165</guid>
		<description>kartik;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You had to bring up the Kansas-Depaul&lt;br/&gt;game. Well the answer will be yes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A EPL game of the week on ESPN will have bigger ratings then an average NCAA BB game. Duke v. NC no. Also, the EPL game would have to be a big four team or team with a well known name attached to it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The time slot is no problem. Either the EPL Monday night game or the early game on Saturday interferes with nothing on the ESPN schedule. US domestic rights on ESPN won&#039;t be that expensive either. THe EPL should want to get their game on, they should almost give it away. Think of the jersey sales in Nashville!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kartik;</p>
<p>You had to bring up the Kansas-Depaul<br />game. Well the answer will be yes.</p>
<p>A EPL game of the week on ESPN will have bigger ratings then an average NCAA BB game. Duke v. NC no. Also, the EPL game would have to be a big four team or team with a well known name attached to it.</p>
<p>The time slot is no problem. Either the EPL Monday night game or the early game on Saturday interferes with nothing on the ESPN schedule. US domestic rights on ESPN won’t be that expensive either. THe EPL should want to get their game on, they should almost give it away. Think of the jersey sales in Nashville!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kartik</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/1137#comment-3164</link>
		<dc:creator>Kartik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/12/10/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/#comment-3164</guid>
		<description>2:00 you cannot be serious? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;First off at the risk of offending some people on this blog I will tell you New England&#039;s tastes in culture, politics and sports are totally unlike the rest of the nation. I wouldn&#039;t base anything nationally on Boston even though the media often times makes this mistake. College Football is a good example. It&#039;s a relatively minor sport in the Northeast but is massive in the rest of the country. So massive that it is the only sport that rivals European Football in England for its ability to not only be well supported but to weave its way into the cultural landscape of the nation. the NFL and NBA may have more viewers than College Football, but the fans aren&#039;t passionate obsessing about the games all year and what recruit each team is bringing in between the seasons. It is truly a cultural phenomena.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Secondly, basing popular support for sports on jersey sales is just plain dumb. I totally agree with MJ. Jersey sales are limited in College Sports and in fact college sports fans more often than not dress nicely to the games, wearing a polo shirt with let&#039;s say Blue and Gold (For Michigan for example) to the games rather than a jersey.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thirdly, ESPN cannot and will not take the weekend rights to the PL or any other Euro league. They just can&#039;t do it. As I&#039;ve said before far more people watch a MAC football game or a mid major college basketball game than the Premier League. That is just reality. I wish it weren&#039;t so, but it is. Central Michigan has more TV viewers in this country than Manchester United. Those of us on EPL Talk may not want to believe it but it is true! &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For Lou, since you are a DePaul grad, do you really think ESPN would have had more viewers with let&#039;s say the Liverpool-Reading game Saturday instead of DePaul-Kansas? IMHO their is no way at all they could ever have more viewers for a EPL game than a game involving Kansas or any other school of similar stature. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I just don&#039;t see any way ESPN shows the EPL here, but as someone said above the highlight package would be a good idea for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2:00 you cannot be serious? </p>
<p>First off at the risk of offending some people on this blog I will tell you New England’s tastes in culture, politics and sports are totally unlike the rest of the nation. I wouldn’t base anything nationally on Boston even though the media often times makes this mistake. College Football is a good example. It’s a relatively minor sport in the Northeast but is massive in the rest of the country. So massive that it is the only sport that rivals European Football in England for its ability to not only be well supported but to weave its way into the cultural landscape of the nation. the NFL and NBA may have more viewers than College Football, but the fans aren’t passionate obsessing about the games all year and what recruit each team is bringing in between the seasons. It is truly a cultural phenomena.  </p>
<p>Secondly, basing popular support for sports on jersey sales is just plain dumb. I totally agree with MJ. Jersey sales are limited in College Sports and in fact college sports fans more often than not dress nicely to the games, wearing a polo shirt with let’s say Blue and Gold (For Michigan for example) to the games rather than a jersey.</p>
<p>Thirdly, ESPN cannot and will not take the weekend rights to the PL or any other Euro league. They just can’t do it. As I’ve said before far more people watch a MAC football game or a mid major college basketball game than the Premier League. That is just reality. I wish it weren’t so, but it is. Central Michigan has more TV viewers in this country than Manchester United. Those of us on EPL Talk may not want to believe it but it is true! </p>
<p>For Lou, since you are a DePaul grad, do you really think ESPN would have had more viewers with let’s say the Liverpool-Reading game Saturday instead of DePaul-Kansas? IMHO their is no way at all they could ever have more viewers for a EPL game than a game involving Kansas or any other school of similar stature. </p>
<p>I just don’t see any way ESPN shows the EPL here, but as someone said above the highlight package would be a good idea for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eplnfl</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/1137#comment-3163</link>
		<dc:creator>eplnfl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/12/10/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/#comment-3163</guid>
		<description>I can say I told you so. You can reveiw my various posts over the last year. This was the logical move. All I want to say is do not over pay for a league that maybe at it&#039;s zenith in popularity and maybe in a bit of a decline.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ESPN should not reduce it&#039;s commitment to MLS, that would be a mistake. MLS will be more valuable to it in the long haul, real long haul.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Also, ESPN obtaining rihgts does not exclude FSC. The NFL rights are shared by various networks and FSC will most likely still show the Lions(pun intended) share of the matches.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Great news. I know most here will not think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can say I told you so. You can reveiw my various posts over the last year. This was the logical move. All I want to say is do not over pay for a league that maybe at it’s zenith in popularity and maybe in a bit of a decline.</p>
<p>ESPN should not reduce it’s commitment to MLS, that would be a mistake. MLS will be more valuable to it in the long haul, real long haul.</p>
<p>Also, ESPN obtaining rihgts does not exclude FSC. The NFL rights are shared by various networks and FSC will most likely still show the Lions(pun intended) share of the matches.</p>
<p>Great news. I know most here will not think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/1137#comment-3162</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/12/10/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/#comment-3162</guid>
		<description>Anonymous at 2 PM, that&#039;s because the Bruins haven&#039;t been any good in recent years and even though Boston College has had some success under Al Skinner, college basketball jerseys don&#039;t sell very well, no matter what school it is.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Part of this is because you can&#039;t get college merchandise with the player&#039;s name on the back; it&#039;s illegal under NCAA rules.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I will guarantee you that college basketball is more popular than soccer in this country, I don&#039;t care what league or country you&#039;re talking about, that&#039;s just a fact.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Since you&#039;re in Boston, let me ask you this. I would wager that you see far more people wearing Red Sox hats, jerseys, hoodies (any merchandise) and Patriots gear than you see wearing anything from Man United or Real Madrid, is that right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous at 2 PM, that’s because the Bruins haven’t been any good in recent years and even though Boston College has had some success under Al Skinner, college basketball jerseys don’t sell very well, no matter what school it is.</p>
<p>Part of this is because you can’t get college merchandise with the player’s name on the back; it’s illegal under NCAA rules.</p>
<p>I will guarantee you that college basketball is more popular than soccer in this country, I don’t care what league or country you’re talking about, that’s just a fact.</p>
<p>Since you’re in Boston, let me ask you this. I would wager that you see far more people wearing Red Sox hats, jerseys, hoodies (any merchandise) and Patriots gear than you see wearing anything from Man United or Real Madrid, is that right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/1137#comment-3161</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2007/12/10/espn-wants-premier-league-tv-rights/#comment-3161</guid>
		<description>Hey 12:58, how do you explain the Premier League being the world&#039;s most expensive to buy TV rights or franchises if you claim College Basketball and Hockey have more interest? I don&#039;t know about your part of the country but up here in Boston I see far more Manchester United or Real Madrid shirts than Hockey or college basketball or even coolege football jerseys. I think you are dead wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey 12:58, how do you explain the Premier League being the world’s most expensive to buy TV rights or franchises if you claim College Basketball and Hockey have more interest? I don’t know about your part of the country but up here in Boston I see far more Manchester United or Real Madrid shirts than Hockey or college basketball or even coolege football jerseys. I think you are dead wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
