10 Responses

  1. NewtonHeath
    NewtonHeath
    August 31, 2009 at 11:10 am | | Reply


    Nice write-up mate. Good points highlighting ‘value’ players since many EPL Talk readers are playing in the fantasy league. I mentioned in another post that Bent and Jones at Sunderland might possibly represent value since they’ve shown they can combine well.

    NH

  2. The Gaffer
    August 31, 2009 at 11:17 am | | Reply


    For the second week in a row, EPL Talk is number one in the Fantasy Premier League: http://fantasy.premierleague.com/M/stats.mc?stat=bestleagues

    That’s based on the average score for members of our private league compared to the thousands of private leagues from around the world.

    Keep up the great work everyone! Hopefully Kevin’s recommendations will help us all out. I know I need a lot of help in fantasy football, that’s for certain.

    Cheers,
    The Gaffer

  3. bigdavestar
    August 31, 2009 at 2:54 pm | | Reply


    One of the things I always try and do is spot value by signing players who have been injured for a while at their cheapest price or new signings like Distin who is a bargin at 4.9 million. I’m a firm believer in building from the back and a good defence with players from the big four clubs will bring in consistent points, one or two goals scoring defenders like Vidic and Lescott can rapidly increase your teams performance.

  4. PL Fantasy
    August 31, 2009 at 3:20 pm | | Reply


    Nice post. I think Adebayor is potentially as good as Drogba and is 0.8m cheaper. I just posted an analysis of the big 5 strikers having come to the conclusion, like yourself, that you need at least one of these guys. I have Torres but I am moving to get Adebayor in too.

  5. SMOOTH
    SMOOTH
    August 31, 2009 at 7:22 pm | | Reply


    Enjoyed the tips! Watch out for emirates 11

  6. Oliver Gaspard
    Oliver Gaspard
    August 31, 2009 at 11:41 pm | | Reply


    Not trying to be a douche but shouldn’t the first paragraph say “who’s” instead of “whose”?

    1. Gaz
      Gaz
      September 1, 2009 at 9:50 am | | Reply


      Whose a douche? :)

    2. Kevin (back page football)
      September 1, 2009 at 4:40 pm | | Reply


      Er, no, it’s “whose”.

      Just re-checked in a Spelling & Grammar programme, “whose” comes up as correct while “who’s” doesn’t.
      :)

      1. Gaz
        Gaz
        September 2, 2009 at 1:39 pm | | Reply


        Nope. It’s “who’s”. This is lame but I’m going to explain why I think this.

        Who’s = Who is
        Whose = to show possession

        Can you tell me whose shot that was?
        Can you tell me who’s on the team?

        “With four Fantasy Premier League gameweeks already down, managers are starting to get an idea of whose scoring points – and whose not.”

        The easiest way to do this is to ask yourself: Can I replace “whose” or “who’s” with “who is”. If so, it should be “who’s”. Or ask yourself if it has anything to do with possession.

        This sentence could be: “…are starting to get an idea of who is scoring points – and who is not.” and has nothing to do with possession. It’s “who’s”.

        1. Gaz
          Gaz
          September 2, 2009 at 1:44 pm | | Reply


          http://www.ehow.com/how_2155633_use-whose-whos-correctly.html

Leave a Reply