9 Responses

  1. Charles
    May 16, 2009 at 1:08 pm | | Reply


    It’s “unacceptable” to lose to Fulham – the same Fulham that is only three spots below them in the table?

    And the semifinals of the Champions League is the “minimum expected”? Really?

    In my mind, the problem with Arsenal this year is that unfortunately spread out their successes across a number of fields. If they had lost in the round of 16 in the Champions League but won the FA Cup, it might be more impressive. Or if they had dropped out of the cups early but been a more serious challenger in the Premier League, same thing.

    Losing in the semifinals is not bad at all. But if you do it a bunch of times, your supporters are likely to feel a lot more irritated than if you have a season with more peaks and valleys.

  2. Gillyo
    Gillyo
    May 16, 2009 at 1:17 pm | | Reply


    One word: ambition.
    If your ambition is to be the best B club in the world, Arsenal were very successful. They are, at the moment, exactly that, the best B team in the world.
    And the job of great B teams in the grand scheme of football is to discover young talents, develop them and sell them for a big profit to the big teams. That’s what happened to Brazilian football.
    So, Arsenal fans should resign themselves to more of the same for the future to come.

  3. Mike K
    Mike K
    May 16, 2009 at 1:36 pm | | Reply


    Arsenal fans won’t accept being a “B” team though for the simple fact that Wenger has done better with the team before. He’s won things in the past, they won’t allow it when their team can’t go on to achieve success like before. Being a “B” side just isn’t good enough when you’ve got the resources, manager and potential of a club like Arsenal. Especially when the club apparently has money to spend but Arsene refuses to spend it so he doesn’t “kill” some of his players.

  4. Nick
    Nick
    May 16, 2009 at 2:21 pm | | Reply


    As an Arsenal fan I was disappointed with the season, but to be honest, I expected it last summer with the departures of Flamini and Hleb. I was upset that Wenger’s only major summer signing was Nasri.

    Saying that, I think people are a little too quick to jump on Arsenal’s back. Before mid-season, Arsenal beat Manchester Utd and Chelsea. They later drew Liverpool 4-4, a team that beat Manchester United 4-1 at Old Trafford. I’m not trying to justify Arsenal’s terrible performances in the Champions League semi-finals and return leg against Chelsea, but it seems every team in the Big Four have had their ups and downs.

    With Wenger set to make one or two new signings, Rosicky and Eduardo returning, and Arshavin qualified to play in the Champions League, next season’s Arsenal is not a club I would write-off as a “B” team.

  5. tyduffy
    May 16, 2009 at 3:33 pm | | Reply


    It’s “unacceptable” to lose to Fulham – the same Fulham that is only three spots below them in the table?

    If you look at the talent disparity in their respective squad list, yes.

    And the semifinals of the Champions League is the “minimum expected”? Really?

    I don’t think you go into the season expecting to make the Champions League semi-finals. But, if your first two matchups are Roma and Villarreal, I don’t think it is as big of an accomplishment as Chelsea going through Juventus and Liverpool, for instance.

  6. Bishopville Red
    May 16, 2009 at 4:03 pm | | Reply


    I have a serious gut feeling that Wenger leaves this summer. his repaired relationship with Fergie, his compliments lavished on his opponents… very uncharacteristic of him. Feels like someone who is saying his goodbyes.

  7. Gillyo
    Gillyo
    May 16, 2009 at 4:32 pm | | Reply


    I, for instance, would like to know what is Arsenal’s real financial situation.
    You read in the papers that they are the 2nd richest club and at the same time Wenger says they can’t compete with Man U.
    Secondly, United and Ferguson had the vision years ago to see they needed an infusion of capital to compete with Chelsea and other big teams. That’s why Malcom Glazer was allowed in. Dein had that vision, but was kicked out and now Arsenal faces this dilema, are they going to be an A or B team.

  8. JLEAU
    JLEAU
    May 17, 2009 at 1:48 pm | | Reply


    The answer to the financial situation is key to assessing the season. If Arsenal are out of money, then Wenger has done a tremendous job. One could question if the current style is best suited to a team with limited means. Most resource limited teams build from the back. But overall, how could the expectations be much higher if the team can’t buy?

    However, if the money is there then Wenger has made some glaring mistakes. This team has been defensively challenged for several years. I can’t express how tired I am of seeing them concede goals on set pieces because we are so weak in the air. Why was no effort made to adequately replace Flamini? Why did they wait until January to go after Arshavin and why was it such a fiasco? A full year of his services would have made a big difference. Not too mention, the situation in January was so bad, how did Arsenal believe they could risk arguing over small dollars compared to what was at stake?

    Based on the meeting with the shareholders, I feel that Wenger is questioning his continued commitment to the club and would not be surprised if we start the new season with a new manager.

  9. ABAYOMI OGUNTOSIN
    ABAYOMI OGUNTOSIN
    May 19, 2009 at 9:55 pm | | Reply


    If Arsene Wenger would remain as arsenal manager in the coming season,he should go back to the drawing board and start from where he missed it.He is indeed a great manager of a great club but he should also know that trophies are won with great and experienced players

Leave a Reply