<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Historic Day for Premiership in U.S.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epltalk.com/historic-day-for-premiership-in-us/296/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epltalk.com/historic-day-for-premiership-in-us/296</link>
	<description>Daily News &#38; Analysis of the English Premier League</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:44:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gratefullawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/historic-day-for-premiership-in-us/296#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Gratefullawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2006/08/19/historic-day-for-premiership-in-us/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>i dont know after a couple beers with my eggs during the liverpool game the aresenal game did look fuzzy and by the time of the reading game.....my hd picture looked just so fine &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;but it was still much better then no footy at all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont know after a couple beers with my eggs during the liverpool game the aresenal game did look fuzzy and by the time of the reading game&#8230;..my hd picture looked just so fine </p>
<p>but it was still much better then no footy at all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/historic-day-for-premiership-in-us/296#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2006/08/19/historic-day-for-premiership-in-us/#comment-545</guid>
		<description>Ah, thanks for the enlightment re conversion, it makes sense. I wasn&#039;t aware that higher number channels got more compressed. Not sure on the LCD front. My LCD monitor NEC 20&quot; TFT 16x9 LCD gives a beautiful bright HD picture, is ok on low channels, some high number like 607 speed, fair on other high number channels. Setanta, and a few south america showing sports action really suck, even compared to commercials and studio feeds.  Good luck with the IPTV feed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, thanks for the enlightment re conversion, it makes sense. I wasn&#8217;t aware that higher number channels got more compressed. Not sure on the LCD front. My LCD monitor NEC 20&#8243; TFT 16&#215;9 LCD gives a beautiful bright HD picture, is ok on low channels, some high number like 607 speed, fair on other high number channels. Setanta, and a few south america showing sports action really suck, even compared to commercials and studio feeds.  Good luck with the IPTV feed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/historic-day-for-premiership-in-us/296#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2006/08/19/historic-day-for-premiership-in-us/#comment-543</guid>
		<description>LA Chelsea Fan:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s not the PAL conversion to NTSC (the reverse would have adverse effects since NTSC has less resolution).  I would speculate that i is simply a function of compression shemes that render the &quot;less watched&quot; or higher up networks subject to the most compression (compare FSC with a retransmission of a broadcast affiiliate).   Compression + LCD renders an awful image, which is why I will retain my tube TV until cable/sat companies change their evil ways.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I am dissapointed that ITVN further degrades the images with their paltry allocation of 1 meg for Setanta&#039;s feed.  Side by side comparisons of video from the ManU/Fulham match (FSC video courtesy of the EPL Review Show) really made apparent how I think it&#039;s rather absurd that ITVN charges the same fee as DirecTV - it was watchable but only because we are sick individuals when it comes to the subject matter!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;-(NY TV guy that may like Chelsea but rather not say)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LA Chelsea Fan:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not the PAL conversion to NTSC (the reverse would have adverse effects since NTSC has less resolution).  I would speculate that i is simply a function of compression shemes that render the &#8220;less watched&#8221; or higher up networks subject to the most compression (compare FSC with a retransmission of a broadcast affiiliate).   Compression + LCD renders an awful image, which is why I will retain my tube TV until cable/sat companies change their evil ways.</p>
<p>I am dissapointed that ITVN further degrades the images with their paltry allocation of 1 meg for Setanta&#8217;s feed.  Side by side comparisons of video from the ManU/Fulham match (FSC video courtesy of the EPL Review Show) really made apparent how I think it&#8217;s rather absurd that ITVN charges the same fee as DirecTV &#8211; it was watchable but only because we are sick individuals when it comes to the subject matter!</p>
<p>-(NY TV guy that may like Chelsea but rather not say)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/historic-day-for-premiership-in-us/296#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2006/08/19/historic-day-for-premiership-in-us/#comment-536</guid>
		<description>I am a Comcast subscriber so it&#039;s FSC for me and to tell you the truth despite all the talk I found the experience better. I did miss the live broadcast of the first match, especially since I was up at 5:00am Central Time to start following the big day online.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Having the ability to follow most of the matches for the day on FSC was much better than following things on the internet at 9:00am. I should also say my new HDTV gave me a much better picture with the digital cable.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I did subscribe to Setanta broadband and I am disappointed that they have very little on broadband over the weekend. The opening round of the cup on Monday will be nice.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;All in all a pretty happy guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Comcast subscriber so it&#8217;s FSC for me and to tell you the truth despite all the talk I found the experience better. I did miss the live broadcast of the first match, especially since I was up at 5:00am Central Time to start following the big day online.</p>
<p>Having the ability to follow most of the matches for the day on FSC was much better than following things on the internet at 9:00am. I should also say my new HDTV gave me a much better picture with the digital cable.</p>
<p>I did subscribe to Setanta broadband and I am disappointed that they have very little on broadband over the weekend. The opening round of the cup on Monday will be nice.</p>
<p>All in all a pretty happy guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/historic-day-for-premiership-in-us/296#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/2006/08/19/historic-day-for-premiership-in-us/#comment-535</guid>
		<description>I meant to say I watched both games at the same time on split screen to compare the quality</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to say I watched both games at the same time on split screen to compare the quality</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
