Comments on: Liverpool’s Magic Triangle: Kuyt, Keane And Gerrard

By: DaveMo

DaveMo — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:54:00 +0000

Not sure of what to make of Liverpool yet. One the one hand, they have clawed back and won some games after going down 2-0 or 2-1, but on the other hand they've needed an opponent to be sent off both times before they started their comebacks. They're more creative in attack, but not as mean in defense as they've been past couple seasons. As a United fan, I cheered for Liverpool to defeat Chelsea because I knew Liverpool would find a way to drop points elsewhere. Chelsea… not so much.

By: zeid hussein

zeid hussein — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:33:12 +0000

liverpools way should be an attacking 442 i beleive.good article thx.ynwa

By: JC

JC — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:14:51 +0000

Finally the ass-kissing I have been waiting for! Ha! But nice article, didn't mean to badger you to the point of appreciating Liverpool, I appreciate the criticisms too, just want to make sure it's proportionate. I think you're dead on about the chemistry between the players, really a joy to watch. The creativity is something that has certainly fluctuated–at times it's brilliant to watch (the passing game against Chelsea was as crisp and fluid as I've seen out of a Liverpool side), but at other times (Stoke City anyone?) the lack of creativity has been frustrating. The subtle loss of creativity against Tottenham after about the 60th minute on Saturday was key to the game turning around. I think with Torres out it's forced the side to be more creative, and Gerrard has really been out of his mind sitting in behind the front man. I am not completely opposed to sticking with the 4-2-3-1 and finding a spot for Keane if need be. Been hard on you Gaffer, but I knew you'd see the light eventually