19 Responses

  1. vishnu
    July 22, 2010 at 7:31 am | | Reply


    hi mate, what does DVR mean?

  2. Jesse Chula
    Jesse Chula
    July 22, 2010 at 7:43 am | | Reply


    DVR stands for digital video recorder.

    It just meant I forgot to record the match when I was out one night and missed it.

    Somewhat of a lame attempt at tech-humor.

  3. Mike
    Mike
    July 22, 2010 at 8:24 am | | Reply


    Sporting and Celtic played a match at Fenway Park in Boston last night, very cool atmosphere, despite the jaded media coverage. http://bit.ly/bYgEjP

  4. Dave
    July 22, 2010 at 8:30 am | | Reply


    So, did anyone ask Michael Owen what he thought of his future home team’s city?

  5. Will
    Will
    July 22, 2010 at 10:24 am | | Reply


    Man United didn’t win vs. Philadelphia Union they tied! they couldn’t beat a low rank team.

    1. obvious
      obvious
      July 22, 2010 at 10:35 am | | Reply


      Ummm, so then the final score of 1-0 to United was wrong. Interesting how you read scores..

  6. Marcus Booster
    Marcus Booster
    July 22, 2010 at 10:26 am | | Reply


    The announcers are just horrible.
    They seem to think that because they have a microphone in front of their mouth that we want to hear about them. Their play-by-play is slow and late and they offer little back-story or history about players. They just seem like a couple of knuckleheads you’d happen to sit next to if you sat at some bar and watched the game.

  7. Bretos Must be Banned
    Bretos Must be Banned
    July 22, 2010 at 10:39 am | | Reply


    The worst line from last night: “fast-break soccer…”

    Horrible announcing from the two of them. I hate when American announcers use basketball/football/baseball analogies to describe the match.

    Oh and to Will who commented above: what game were you watching? The game ended 1-0.

    1. njndirish
      July 22, 2010 at 11:05 am | | Reply


      I don’t understand why everyone makes such a big deal about parallel terminology
      Keeper=tender
      fast break=counter attack
      Tackle=steal
      Field=pitch
      Offside=Offsides
      Derby=Rivalry Game
      Sideline=Touchline

      And there are many others
      I use them interchangeably in all sports. People are from different cultures and have different dialects and are raised using different terms to describe the same thing.

      If you’re that anal about the announcers there’s always the mute button

      1. Smokey Bacon
        Smokey Bacon
        July 22, 2010 at 6:21 pm | | Reply


        If we are going to allow stuff like this, then I’d like the NFL announcers to refer to their sport as Throwball. Or how about baseball=rounders? A tackle is a tackle is a tackle. It is NEVER a steal. A keeper is never a tender. And enough already with that “on frame”, “PK” bullshit too.

        Btw, Bretos is a clown who is already undermining ESPN’s coverage. “Eeeeeeyyyyeesssssssssss” whenever a goal is scored. WTF.

      2. Bretos Must be Banned
        Bretos Must be Banned
        July 22, 2010 at 7:42 pm | | Reply


        Different Cultures? Different Dialects? Mute Button?

        What ARE you talking about njndirish? I was merely stating that its annoying when American announcers use analogies.

        Calm down down idiot!

        Oh and you said “anal”…..hahaaaa!

  8. patrick
    patrick
    July 22, 2010 at 11:10 am | | Reply


    I understand you are writing this for Man U fans, but the Union dominated the ball most of the match. Man U used long balls and pace to try an beat the ball hungry Philadelphia squad. But couldn’t. Giggs looks old and slow wide, missed a clear chance then moaned for a spot kick which was never going to come. Le Toux outclassed the Man U back line over and over and just couldn’t finish. Scholes was missing most of the match except for a poor tackle that earned him a yellow.

    Sort of sad that you wore your fanboy glasses for this one…

    1. Jesse Chula
      Jesse Chula
      July 22, 2010 at 1:31 pm | | Reply


      May have to agree to disagree on this one.

      Although the Union represented themselves quite well – something i touched on numerous times in the article – they in no way dominated most of the match. That point is silly and absurd.

      Also keep in mind that this was United’s 2nd match of their preseason tour – not likely to be at their best.

      And if I have my Manchester United ‘fanboy glasses’ on then would it be safe to say that you have your MLS or Union ‘fanboy glasses’ on?

      The Union didn’t exactly set the world on fire last night.

      Lastly, this is a website that covers the Premier League and not the MLS. I can guarantee you that every article I write will have something to do with the Premier League and or a Premier League side and will be written from that perspective. Point in case, United and the Union in last night’s match.

      If you’re looking for article’s written from the perspective of the MLS and MLS clubs, check out http://www.majorleaguesoccertalk.com.

      1. tokes
        tokes
        July 22, 2010 at 1:43 pm | | Reply


        Don’t like Man U and definitely don’t like MLS, and I gotta agree with Patrick on this one – Philly was the better team for the majority of the game. They had the better chances but their finishing was poor, mostly becasue Mwanga’s thru balls were consistently too heavy and the shot had to come in from a tight angle. Man U only scored on a tired giveaway in midfield. Scholes was decent, but Giggs did look old and tired… Welbeck is fast!

        Overall pretty good for an exhibition – hope NYRB vs. Tottenham will be even better tonite. COYS

      2. patrick
        patrick
        July 22, 2010 at 4:16 pm | | Reply


        Yeah know… wow.

        defensive much?

        I said Union Dominated the ball. and they did. there where periods where they’d have 30 passes without Man U even getting a sniff.
        Even in the second half when Union unloaded its bench, Man U had trouble. and yeah I get that this is a PL blog, and I am hardly a MLS fan… I’m the one who says they are just a div 1 league… But if you wanna be taken seriously you can’t write such subjective recounts as this. Besides, what I wrote about was Man U weakness not the Union.

        so thin skinned…

    2. troy
      troy
      July 22, 2010 at 1:35 pm | | Reply


      Well, last time I checked this site was called EPL talk, not MLS talk. If you really care about the philly side of things, here you go…http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/soccer/20100722_Union_united_in_effort__but_falls_to_Manchester_United.html

      But otherwise, I think jesse is pretty aware of his audience and who he’s writing for. If you go back and read his post again, you’ll find multiple times where he praises the Union and comes down on MUFC. It’s a pretty honest analysis and what I would expect from someone that is an admitted Red Devils fan. He’s looking for the good in his team, but also willing say when something is frustrating him *cough* Obertan *cough*. And if you’re annoyed by fanboy glasses, you probably shouldn’t be reading MUFC analysis from an MUFC fan. Just sayin’.

    3. MNUfan1991
      MNUfan1991
      July 22, 2010 at 6:38 pm | | Reply


      Union had long spells of posession, but so did United. Overall, posession was quite even.
      Union had a handful of really good chances but could not finish. That being said, they were equally lucky in the several United chances that didn’t go in… Berba rattling the crossbar for one, the handful of close range shots saved by the keeper for others.
      Union came out to play and did well. When watching the game, you can tell the big guns at United really didn’t want to go into challenges–I could count the number of slide tackles with one hand. This is, of course, perfectly understandable. These are pre-season games. There are no trophies.
      In the end, quality shone through.
      Observations from Lincoln Financial Field, Section C20.

  9. Smokey Bacon
    Smokey Bacon
    July 22, 2010 at 6:27 pm | | Reply


    Great game last night – one of the better pre-season friendlys I can remember The Union gave as good as they got and could easily have nicked it. I fear for United. They look thin minus the world cup contingent. I think they could do a Liverpool this year and struggle to make the top four.

  10. Poker Rakeback
    July 22, 2010 at 8:07 pm | | Reply


    I don’t think they will struggle, after all it was a 2nd team that Man Utd had starting that game. How many players who started that game last night will start on the opening day of the Premier League season? My guess would be one, Paul Scholes.
    I thought the Union did well and passed the ball well but I don’t know how much we can read into it, I think if any team plays their second team in pre-seaon away from home then they are hardly going to go and win 5-0 unless the opponents are really crap which the union were not.

Leave a Reply