15 Responses

  1. Peter
    Peter
    November 12, 2009 at 11:30 am | | Reply


    Also, to add to your argument, does it seem really seem fair to the other Scottish teams to the take the two best teams in the league out of it? Would Sir Alex Ferguson have been thought of as brilliant as he was with Aberdeen if both Celtic and Rangers weren’t there at the time?

    If they want to concentrate on changing the boring “to me to you” title race in Soctland, they can start by shifting the main financial power from Glasgow and spread it evenly across the country. I totally agree that the league system in Scotland is absolutely ludicrous. Why have four leagues when you can have two and why bang on about how good Celtic and Rangers are when everyone knows that the rest of league is a joke. Celtic and Rangers have also proved just how good they really are, when they play teams that are actually good. Every season they get into the Champions League Qualifiers and every season they do woefully. Rangers are an absolute joke, losing to Unirea Urziceni 4-1 at their own home is a joke. Celtic fare no better and I think it’s about time they began giving teams like Hearts, Hibernian, Aberdeen, Dundee, Dundee United, Falkirk, Queen of the South, St.Mirren and alll the others more spending power. You only have to look at Falkirk and Hibernian’s recent heroics against Celtic and Rangers respectively and Queen Of The Souths in the Scottish Cup last season to see what they can do with limited funding. It’s time to see what they could do with a bigger bank balance.

  2. oliver
    oliver
    November 12, 2009 at 11:32 am | | Reply


    “Whilst the idea of franchise sport is nothing new to American fans, to the British it is unthinkable”

    What would you call Woolwich Arsenal moving from south London to north London due to financial instability, low crowds and being essentially insolvent? Nothing more than a re-location under a new name in a new area?

    1. Peter
      Peter
      November 12, 2009 at 11:48 am | | Reply


      Obviously it doesn’t matter if it happened a hundred years ago!

    2. Paul Bestall
      Paul Bestall
      November 12, 2009 at 11:48 am | | Reply


      And to this day Charlton and Tottenham fans still call them Woolwich. Besides, moving the club had more to do with corrupt owners than anything else.

  3. randomsausage
    randomsausage
    November 12, 2009 at 11:51 am | | Reply


    Hilarious. The Old Firm remind me of slobbering puppies who keep getting kicked…..but who still come back for more. I guess they’ll have to content themselves playing the “Diddy” teams for eternity. Oh, and getting knocked out of the Champions League early every year.

    This is the best news I’ve seen in a long time.

  4. Ryan
    November 12, 2009 at 12:37 pm | | Reply


    To Oliver –

    NFL teams have been moved clear across the country, I think that’s the point that was being made.

  5. man99utd
    man99utd
    November 12, 2009 at 12:46 pm | | Reply


    I’m a fan of the SPL, but wouldn’t it make more sense for them to actually attempt to compete with the EPl rather than join it? Besides, look at the money they would lose by not being in Champions league at all. Rangers surely need the money…

  6. brn442
    brn442
    November 12, 2009 at 1:09 pm | | Reply


    If the Old Firm wants to play in England they should have to join the Football League (old fourth division) or non (blue square) league and “work” their way up just like any other club. It’s not fair to the likes of Forest, Leeds, or Notts County otherwise, and just like Cardiff, Swansea and Wrexham, they will have issues with UEFA when it comes to Europe anyway.

    Unless, Scotland, Wales, and N Ireland are willing to give up their home nations status , there will be no chance of a British League.

    Like you said, the Old Firm and the SFA should focus on making their product more interesting and competitive.

  7. Peter
    Peter
    November 12, 2009 at 1:22 pm | | Reply


    Just a quick question. If Cardiff had won the F.A Cup against Portsmouth in 2007, would they have been eligible to play in the Uefa Cup, as it was known as then?

    1. sam
      sam
      November 12, 2009 at 4:18 pm | | Reply


      i think so

  8. Jason
    Jason
    November 12, 2009 at 10:21 pm | | Reply


    Perhaps the Scottish league should now expand to 18 teams now. As far as the English league goes. I suggest 18 teams in EPL1 (relegate 3), 18 in EPL2 (relegate 2 or 3). Tier 3, 4, 5 with 20 teams each this is the Football League level. The Conference National becomes tier 6.

  9. Eric
    Eric
    November 12, 2009 at 10:50 pm | | Reply


    love the redskins reference

  10. British Cup.
    February 27, 2010 at 4:21 pm | | Reply


    I would prefer a European super league with the big sides from the small nations Plus British cup for small sides from the league one and league two.

  11. British Cup.
    February 27, 2010 at 4:45 pm | | Reply


    Gretna only reached the premier because they got bankrolled after they joined the scottish league.

    In their first year in the Scottish league they finished in mid table in the third divisions surely you know this.

  12. Dluisi
    Dluisi
    March 2, 2010 at 10:57 am | | Reply


    Who would want to see the Sweaties play in the Premier league anyway !

    ‘It took MK Dons 7 years to stop using Wimbledons history and correctly allow AFC Wimbledon to have the rights to their real history.’

    and get your facts right here too…less than 3 years and AFC have also have no rights to the history either. Trophies and history were transferred to the borough of Merton.

    Oh and a good analogy with Gretna …Not

Leave a Reply