<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Premiership Preview&#8211;10. West Ham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epltalk.com/premiership-preview-10-west-ham/2836/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epltalk.com/premiership-preview-10-west-ham/2836</link>
	<description>Daily News &#38; Analysis of the English Premier League</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:52:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Sp*ds</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/premiership-preview-10-west-ham/2836#comment-19207</link>
		<dc:creator>Sp*ds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 07:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/premiership-preview-10-west-ham/2836#comment-19207</guid>
		<description>yer to rite f*ck spurs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yer to rite f*ck spurs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kennyhammer</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/premiership-preview-10-west-ham/2836#comment-19120</link>
		<dc:creator>Kennyhammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/premiership-preview-10-west-ham/2836#comment-19120</guid>
		<description>Well thought out article, I hope LBM leaves the club in this window. He has performed well at his previous clubs but, he just doesn&#039;t seem to fit our system of play, choosing the wrong pass or shooting when the better option is to play someone else in. It appears that AC has less say in transfers and he only targets players he would like then leaves it to BG ,SD and Nani. This must be better to help stabilize the club. 
If AC&#039;s Charlton credentials are correct his sides always start the season well and tail off after Xmas so our fixtures would favour this.  I hope we can improve this year with players fit but I fear we will end up 10th or worse, we are becoming the new charlton of the EPL, safe but unattractive to watch, after fifty nail biting years as a supporter I don&#039;t like this. At these ticket prices I can stay at home and be bored sh**less looking at the wife. Wherever we end up in the league let&#039;s play some entertaining stuff not negitive football like last year.  
Let&#039;s blow some bl**dy great bubbles and finish above Sp**s!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well thought out article, I hope LBM leaves the club in this window. He has performed well at his previous clubs but, he just doesn&#8217;t seem to fit our system of play, choosing the wrong pass or shooting when the better option is to play someone else in. It appears that AC has less say in transfers and he only targets players he would like then leaves it to BG ,SD and Nani. This must be better to help stabilize the club.<br />
If AC&#8217;s Charlton credentials are correct his sides always start the season well and tail off after Xmas so our fixtures would favour this.  I hope we can improve this year with players fit but I fear we will end up 10th or worse, we are becoming the new charlton of the EPL, safe but unattractive to watch, after fifty nail biting years as a supporter I don&#8217;t like this. At these ticket prices I can stay at home and be bored sh**less looking at the wife. Wherever we end up in the league let&#8217;s play some entertaining stuff not negitive football like last year.<br />
Let&#8217;s blow some bl**dy great bubbles and finish above Sp**s!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/premiership-preview-10-west-ham/2836#comment-19092</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/premiership-preview-10-west-ham/2836#comment-19092</guid>
		<description>McCartney started every game at left back last season, so I can&#039;t see him moving to right back, and especially not to accommodate Behrami, who is a winger first, right back second, left back never.

I understand Parker is a better player than Mullins, but Parker is NEVER healthy for any length of time. You know his track record; it would be foolish to rely on him to start more than 20 games this year.

My criteria for success isn&#039;t winning the league, it&#039;s based on a couple things: consistent top-10 finishes, qualification for European competition, and deep runs in the domestic cups. Like I&#039;ve said, West Ham is always good for pulling off an upset or two, but it doesn&#039;t mean anything to me if they can&#039;t consistently play well against the teams they should beat. They step up their game against United and Liverpool, but overlook their next opponent so much that you wonder if you watched a completely different team the week before.

To add one more academy player to your list, Freddie Sears is one that will get also get some time up front.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCartney started every game at left back last season, so I can&#8217;t see him moving to right back, and especially not to accommodate Behrami, who is a winger first, right back second, left back never.</p>
<p>I understand Parker is a better player than Mullins, but Parker is NEVER healthy for any length of time. You know his track record; it would be foolish to rely on him to start more than 20 games this year.</p>
<p>My criteria for success isn&#8217;t winning the league, it&#8217;s based on a couple things: consistent top-10 finishes, qualification for European competition, and deep runs in the domestic cups. Like I&#8217;ve said, West Ham is always good for pulling off an upset or two, but it doesn&#8217;t mean anything to me if they can&#8217;t consistently play well against the teams they should beat. They step up their game against United and Liverpool, but overlook their next opponent so much that you wonder if you watched a completely different team the week before.</p>
<p>To add one more academy player to your list, Freddie Sears is one that will get also get some time up front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoatyGav</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/premiership-preview-10-west-ham/2836#comment-19091</link>
		<dc:creator>GoatyGav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/premiership-preview-10-west-ham/2836#comment-19091</guid>
		<description>Much of what you&#039;ve said here is true. Your analysis is purely from the perspective of the coming season. No mention is given to the &quot;Academy&quot; players who you will start to see introduced throughout the season. James Tomkins is already pressing Anton Ferdinand and Matthew Upson very hard and there are many more who are coming through with Tony Carr&#039;s Tutelage.

There is a long term plan at the club to develop youth talent and then, contrary to past strategy, keep them at the club to be integrated in to a well established team that will have a good understanding of each other. This is the plan.

Just one question for you. You mentioned several times in your piece teams that are &quot;Taken Seriously.&quot; Is your only success criteria winning the league? I can assure you that the other 19 teams in the Premier league take West Ham seriously. Mainly because they realize that on their day they&#039;re a match for anyone but also out of respect for a team with home grown talent and an proud and long history for playing enterprising, attacking and entertaining football.

Increasingly football is about money. The more you have the more success you can buy. There is, however, a more admirable way than just buying success. What West Ham are trying to do is build on strong foundations.

I sincerely hope it goes to plan.

Outside of this you&#039;ve listed a very weak first eleven. I would be more inclined to go: -

GK Green
LB Behrami
CB Tomkins
CB Upson
RB McCartney
LM Etherington
CM Parker
CM Noble
RM Faubert
CF Ashton
CF Cole(Bellamy when fit)

Neill and Boa Morte were atrocious last term and Mullins has to move up a level to come up to Parker&#039;s quality. Faubert simply scares the living daylights out of opposition defenders. He&#039;s West Ham&#039;s one to watch this year.

You may be in for a surprise - if your well made point about staying fit and injury free comes true.

COME ON U IRONS!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of what you&#8217;ve said here is true. Your analysis is purely from the perspective of the coming season. No mention is given to the &#8220;Academy&#8221; players who you will start to see introduced throughout the season. James Tomkins is already pressing Anton Ferdinand and Matthew Upson very hard and there are many more who are coming through with Tony Carr&#8217;s Tutelage.</p>
<p>There is a long term plan at the club to develop youth talent and then, contrary to past strategy, keep them at the club to be integrated in to a well established team that will have a good understanding of each other. This is the plan.</p>
<p>Just one question for you. You mentioned several times in your piece teams that are &#8220;Taken Seriously.&#8221; Is your only success criteria winning the league? I can assure you that the other 19 teams in the Premier league take West Ham seriously. Mainly because they realize that on their day they&#8217;re a match for anyone but also out of respect for a team with home grown talent and an proud and long history for playing enterprising, attacking and entertaining football.</p>
<p>Increasingly football is about money. The more you have the more success you can buy. There is, however, a more admirable way than just buying success. What West Ham are trying to do is build on strong foundations.</p>
<p>I sincerely hope it goes to plan.</p>
<p>Outside of this you&#8217;ve listed a very weak first eleven. I would be more inclined to go: -</p>
<p>GK Green<br />
LB Behrami<br />
CB Tomkins<br />
CB Upson<br />
RB McCartney<br />
LM Etherington<br />
CM Parker<br />
CM Noble<br />
RM Faubert<br />
CF Ashton<br />
CF Cole(Bellamy when fit)</p>
<p>Neill and Boa Morte were atrocious last term and Mullins has to move up a level to come up to Parker&#8217;s quality. Faubert simply scares the living daylights out of opposition defenders. He&#8217;s West Ham&#8217;s one to watch this year.</p>
<p>You may be in for a surprise &#8211; if your well made point about staying fit and injury free comes true.</p>
<p>COME ON U IRONS!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/premiership-preview-10-west-ham/2836#comment-19074</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/premiership-preview-10-west-ham/2836#comment-19074</guid>
		<description>Curbs need&#039;s to sign at least 2 more players if we are going to do anything this season. Gaffa your right, Boa Morte is one of the worst players ive ever seen in the premier league let alone a West Ham shirt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curbs need&#8217;s to sign at least 2 more players if we are going to do anything this season. Gaffa your right, Boa Morte is one of the worst players ive ever seen in the premier league let alone a West Ham shirt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
