9 Responses

  1. tony
    tony
    April 26, 2009 at 2:59 pm | | Reply


    it’s almost as bad as the ronaldo transfer speculation …

  2. Raatzie
    Raatzie
    April 26, 2009 at 3:54 pm | | Reply


    This site is killing the Premier League for me.

  3. Rich
    Rich
    April 26, 2009 at 6:27 pm | | Reply


    If you think this is bad, don’t ever watch ESPN for general sports. Every ESPN show (when they’re not showing live programming) is 100% what you’ve described above.

  4. Dave
    April 26, 2009 at 7:09 pm | | Reply


    Rich? Rich Eisen? Is that you?

  5. eplnfl
    eplnfl
    April 26, 2009 at 8:16 pm | | Reply


    Rich Eisen line. Love it.

    Well do we really need to see a table year after year that says Man U, Liverpool, Chelsea, Gunner’s at the top. Think how hard it is for the pundits who have to cover all the games to get excited over Fulham v. Wigan, love them both btw, just an example how come April who cares about most of the teams. If someone else but the big 4 could be in the race for the crown maybe the pundits would sound better.

  6. Chris Walker
    Chris Walker
    April 27, 2009 at 5:20 am | | Reply


    it’s a fair point epInfl but when the teams kick off 30 mins apart do we really need to see the table four times? Surely they can just show us at the start of the day and the end of the day or even at the end of that weeks round of matches?

  7. David Nathaniel
    David Nathaniel
    April 27, 2009 at 10:48 am | | Reply


    Did you actually run out of something to write or something? If you are a proper journalist, you should know the reason why the pundits or commentators repeat this information, purely because not everyone tunes in at the same time amongst other reasons…

    Incase you dont like the hype, some of us actually do like the hype created and being kept on our toes. As much as the pundits hype things up and make them sound like the scenario is do or die… thats what it really is to the teams involved.

    I must admit with one of the above comments though… ESPN commentators as well as ‘hype’ in-between programming is much much worse its actually irritating. ESPN should just not commentate on games.. they really trully S.U.C.K!!!

  8. Chris Walker
    Chris Walker
    April 27, 2009 at 2:42 pm | | Reply


    No i didn’t run out of something to write David but thank you for contributing. How can any game be do or die with 12 points to play for? Fair enough if failure to win means instant relegation but in Newcastle’s case it doesnt (well for now anyway). As for being kept on one’s toes – surely after having had nearly a week to check the table and being shown it again at the start of the day, even if you were to tune in late you would still be made aware of any previous results anyway. In addition you evidently have access to the internet so is isn’t as though you dont know what 3 points for Liverpool etc means. I’m not saying there should be no build up to games but my point is that considering the vast numbers of televised league games there are every week, does every single instance need to be made in to the moment that defines a season? I accept and concede that on or a day where a team can win a title or be relegated that this is understandable

  9. CMG
    CMG
    April 27, 2009 at 10:24 pm | | Reply


    I guess all color commentators in every sport throughout the world are more of the same.

Leave a Reply