19 Responses

  1. john toher
    July 6, 2009 at 11:15 am | | Reply


    Very good article, witty and insightful, well done.

  2. MarkD
    MarkD
    July 6, 2009 at 12:32 pm | | Reply


    Well written, some truth in there. Liverpool have the right ingredients, I hope neither of the pair leave!

  3. Dicky1975
    Dicky1975
    July 6, 2009 at 1:14 pm | | Reply


    At last, a well written amusing article that actually has some well thought out points. Well done sir!

  4. k
    k
    July 6, 2009 at 2:12 pm | | Reply


    Completely agree with you.I don’t see any of the two leaving despite the noise.Barcelona doesn’t have the money Real have too many midfielders..
    Witty write up !Keep it coming

  5. Tyson
    Tyson
    July 6, 2009 at 2:27 pm | | Reply


    I think this article assumes that the competition for Liverpool were at their best the previous season.

    Manchester United had a terrible start to the season and I won’t even begin to mention Chelsea.

    If Manchester United dropped that many points at the beginning of last season but Liverpool didnt drop their points towards the middle of the season then Liverpool would have probably eeked out enough points overall to pip United to the post but lets assume Manchester United didnt have such a bad first half of the seaosn. Where would Liverpools title hopes be?

    Plus not to mention its wishful thinking Mascherano and Alonso won’t leave.

    I mean Alonso is really keen on leaving Liverpool and so is Mascherano whoose wife also wants a move. Neither of them are likely to be there next season if what Mascheranos agent and Alonso are saying stay the same. Considering they would end up playing at Barcelona and Real Madrid with higher wages and a better climate it’s kind of hard to say they will magically change their minds.

    This is all pretty much wishful thinking unless Manchester United and Chelsea screw up again this year.

  6. Obaydah Al-NAmer
    Obaydah Al-NAmer
    July 6, 2009 at 2:46 pm | | Reply


    Well it’s a mediocre article, you didn’t show how Liverpool will play and win.

    ” Glen Johnson will be instrumental in helping the Reds dissect the ten-man defenses of Stoke, West Ham, Fulham, (and I presume…) ”

    u didn’t explain how will he be instrumental.

  7. Steve Perry
    Steve Perry
    July 6, 2009 at 3:14 pm | | Reply


    why are scousers so delusional? must be something in the trash. anyway, any benefit johnson brings against stoke, et al, will quickly be forgotten as he tends to single-handedly gift opposition goals (e.g. uzbekistan) every other game or so. most people who actually know something about football would agree that there is a better than average chance citeh will finish higher up the table, Luckily Wenger is still in charge of arsenal so ‘pool has a decent chance of making the CL.

  8. Tyler
    Tyler
    July 6, 2009 at 3:36 pm | | Reply


    What a joke. Liverpool are absolute cack!

  9. CA_backpacker
    CA_backpacker
    July 6, 2009 at 3:39 pm | | Reply


    While I am taking a wait-and-see on Johnson, I totally agree that without Alonso and Masch, L’pool will be lucky to finish in the top 4. Don’t even bring up Lucas…Rafa might love him, but I haven’t seen anything out of Lucas to make me think he can step into a regular valuable role in our midfield anytime soon.

    If we keep Xabi and Masch, L’pool should be in good shape barring any major injuries…and that final qualification is huge, because we clearly aren’t deep. When Rafa fiddles around and puts out a “B” squad and we tend to lose, and often against substandard teams. We simply don’t have the depth that teams like MU or Chelski have, and have to keep our best on the pitch all season.

    My biggest concern now and going forward is the huge debt load the Reds have right now, and how much pressure the front office has got to be under to sell off some talent.

  10. Spenser
    July 6, 2009 at 3:48 pm | | Reply


    Very true.

    I assume this is tomorrow, but what say you for wingers?

    Also assuming you mean a 4-4-1-1 with more of a diamond in the middle? With Masch as DM and Xabi at the top covering Stevie and Nando with beautiful passes and the occasional 35-yard goal?

  11. 50
    50
    July 6, 2009 at 8:48 pm | | Reply


    i agree with all your points….but i really do believe

    A)Xabi will leave for real madrid
    B)though he has looked fantastic,Riera will be second in line for LW after we sign Silva.

    1. Ian rush
      July 7, 2009 at 1:55 am | | Reply


      SILVA WONT GOE TO LIVERPOOL ive spoken to his agent and hes not interesed it a merseyside move

  12. Ian rush
    July 7, 2009 at 1:50 am | | Reply


    Very good article and i can see that liverpool hae the bckbone to win it but they neeed the depth up front to accomadate for when torres is injures or just a forward o back up torres

  13. Adam M
    Adam M
    July 7, 2009 at 2:02 am | | Reply


    Alonso must be kept if we are to have a good shot at the title.

    Mascherano is a great player, but when a player is rated at 40 million you expect very little shortcomings, you expect a complete midfielder. In a defensive sense he is one of the best, but in terms of attack i would say he is below average.

    If the 40 million offer is true it needs to be considered, it is likely we can get a replacement that can offer 90% of what macherano does for less then 20 million.

    In the modern game every position other then center-halves needs to chip in some offence. Last season Masch had 2 assists and 0 goals in 51 games. To put that in perspective Momo Sissoko got 2 goals and 1 assist in 28 games in the same season.

  14. Peter
    Peter
    July 7, 2009 at 4:57 am | | Reply


    Interesting that you mention Kewell. 12 goals from 34 games this year is a pretty reasonable return. He was also the starting centre half in one game. If Liverpool had kept Kewell, with him share the left wing with Riera, maybe they would have won the title.

  15. FredTheRed
    FredTheRed
    July 7, 2009 at 6:34 am | | Reply


    Re: words. Do you mean Bollocks not Bullocks?

    1. Ethan Armstrong
      Ethan Armstrong
      July 7, 2009 at 8:06 am | | Reply


      I did mean Bollocks. Thank you. Funnily enough, after I was away from the computer yesterday I started trying to remember if “knackered” was spelled with a “k” or not, worried I’d be called out on that one. This is why Americans need to get these words going in the vocab. So I’ll start spelling them consistently right.

      Thanks for reading, all.

      Second half of the article should be up within the hour.

  16. Chris
    Chris
    July 8, 2009 at 1:22 am | | Reply


    Great article Ethan but just fyi it’s not “bullocks”, it is in fact “bollocks”, as in testicles.

  17. Chris
    Chris
    July 8, 2009 at 1:29 am | | Reply


    Just saw Fred the Red’s comment and your reply so sorry and ignore my ealier comment. It was utter bollocks anyway.

Leave a Reply