<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Premier League blog, soccer news and football shirts from EPL Talk &#187; Spirit of Shankly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epltalk.com/tag/spirit-of-shankly/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epltalk.com</link>
	<description>EPL Talk is your source for daily news, interviews and analysis of the English Premier League, the world&#039;s number one soccer league.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 11:10:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Liverpool Supporters Erect Anti Hicks and Gillett Billboards</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/liverpool-supporters-erect-anti-hicks-and-gillett-billboards-16438</link>
		<comments>http://www.epltalk.com/liverpool-supporters-erect-anti-hicks-and-gillett-billboards-16438#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Gaffer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Gillett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liverpool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirit of Shankly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Hicks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/?p=16438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spirit of Shankly, a Liverpool supporter’s union, has erected billboard posters in its city to protest against the American owners of Liverpool FC, Tom Hicks and George Gillett. The posters, which read “Tom &#38; George: Debt, Lies, Cowboys – Not &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<p><a href="/media/2010/03/anti-hicks-gillett-billboard.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-16437" title="anti-hicks-gillett-billboard" src="/media/2010/03/anti-hicks-gillett-billboard.jpg" alt="anti hicks gillett billboard Liverpool Supporters Erect Anti Hicks and Gillett Billboards" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>
<p>Spirit of Shankly, a Liverpool supporter’s union, has erected billboard posters in its city to protest against the American owners of Liverpool FC, Tom Hicks and George Gillett.</p>
<p>The posters, which read “Tom &amp; George: Debt, Lies, Cowboys – Not Welcome Here,” have appeared on billboards on major roads into Liverpool. Five have been rolled out so far with another five expected soon, according to the <a href="http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-fc/liverpool-fc-news/2010/03/03/liverpool-fans-take-anti-gillett-and-hicks-campaign-to-billboards-100252-25949928/" target="_blank">Liverpool Echo</a>.</p>
<p>“Tom Hicks and George Gillett aren’t welcome at Liverpool Football Club,” said a message on the <a href="http://www.spiritofshankly.com/debtliescowboys.html" target="_blank">Spirit of Shankly website</a>. “They were at first – they made promises that the fans believed, and we all looked to a rosy red future. That future now looks dark and bleak under Hicks and Gillett, and we as fans need to change that.”</p>
<p>The three key messages on the billboard posters focus on debt, lies and cowboys. When Hicks and Gillett bought Liverpool FC, the club reportedly had a debt of approximately £44 million. That debt has now grown to £237 million.</p>
<p>Liverpool supporters also feel that Hicks and Gillett have lied to them several times. First, that Hicks and Gillett said that the takeover of Liverpool would have no debt involved in it. Second, that the American owners built up the hopes of Liverpool fans that a new ground would be developed yet never materialized. And third, over the way that the American owners publicly admitted that they were in talks with Jurgen Klinsmann to replace Benitez.</p>
<p>The reference by Spirit Of Shankly to cowboys refers to “Their job as ‘custodians’ [which] has been nothing but making it up as they go along, taking expenses (over £2 million as shown in the accounts up to 2009) from the club for their no expense spared trips to come and watch us play, entertaining family and friends along the way.”</p>
<p>Photo credit: <a href="http://www.spiritofshankly.com/debtliescowboys.html" target="_blank">Spirit Of Shankly</a></p>
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tottenham Hotspur Face New Kit Backlash</title>
		<link>http://www.epltalk.com/tottenham-hotspur-face-new-kit-backlash-8669</link>
		<comments>http://www.epltalk.com/tottenham-hotspur-face-new-kit-backlash-8669#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bestall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Athletico Madrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Levy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ebbsfleet United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FC United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirit of Shankly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tottenham Hotspur]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epltalk.com/?p=8669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The build up had been going on for weeks, with the first teasers of the new kit advertised on the hoardings surrounding the pitch during Spurs’ final home League game against Manchester City. “Glory Comes In Three Colours” read the &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<p><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.epltalk.com/wp-content/uploads/flickr.com/2009/06/spurskit.jpg" alt="spurskit Tottenham Hotspur Face New Kit Backlash" width="513" height="592" title="Tottenham Hotspur Face New Kit Backlash" /></p>
<p>The build up had been going on for weeks, with the first teasers of the new kit advertised on the hoardings surrounding the pitch during Spurs’ final home League game against Manchester City. “Glory Comes In Three Colours” read the tagline, and Spurs fans collectively shrugged at the thought of having another 3 kits for the fourth season in a row. Since the Puma deal started in the 2005-2006 season, Spurs have had 13 new outfield player kits and 8 goalkeeper kits, plus 2 Carling Cup Final limited editions.</p>
<p>Being a Spurs fan is not cheap, even in these heady times of the Premiership. Whilst theirs plenty of money floating around, it still isn’t driving down the cost of supporting Tottenham in particular. Yet, being a fan, you kind of get used to the expense over the years. You don’t fully accept it, but you can’t help supporting the team you love can you? When it’s an emotional attachment, all common sense goes out of the window.</p>
<p>Yet, I couldn’t help but feel really disappointed with the new kits, especially the home shirt in the leaked images that were floating around the internet. It just didn’t look right and I was hoping it would be the same as the awful mock up’s of the England kit that were flying about only to be disproved when the real thing was released.  Some fans had certainly been vocal in their hostility to it, whilst others refused to believe the images were real.</p>
<p><span id="more-8669"></span></p>
<p>So with a large fanfare, and microsite publicising the release of the new kits, Tottenham could relax in the knowledge that the fans would be fine with whatever they were served up. They were wrong though. Within minutes of the kits finally being revealed to the fans, text messages, facebook profiles and  twitter accounts began to show the real feelings of the fans. In general, they hated the new home kit.</p>
<p>A petition was quickly set up, <a href="http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/yidsagainstyellow/index.html" target="_blank">yidsagainstyellow</a> and as of today, it’s reached almost 2,700 signatures. So I rang the club to ask them what they feel about this response. Suffice to say, they’ve ignored it and tried to sell the kit to me! I advised them that unless they’d give it away, I wasn’t interested but they still wanted £45.00 so I passed. Ah well.</p>
<p>I must admit I’m a little bit staggered by the response, if I’m honest. Whilst I hate it, due to the yellow stripes and dabs on it, I didn’t expect anyone else to dislike as much. In fact, I’m quite shocked just how many people do hate it but I think it shows just how much fan interaction has come on through the internet. From the formation of <a href="http://www.fc-utd.co.uk/" target="_blank">F.C. United</a>, to the purchase of <a href="http://www.myfootballclub.co.uk/" target="_blank">Ebbsfleet </a>by members of myfootballclub.com to the <a href="http://www.spiritofshankly.com/" target="_blank">Spirit of Shankly group</a>, fans can now interact without having to meet face to face.</p>
<p>If anything, I really dislike the fact that football clubs decide on new kits without consulting the fans. Whether football clubs like it or not, it is an important barometer of the clubs status to see shirts being worn other than on a match day. If you have the audacity of Tottenham in regards to kit releases, <em>13 in 4 season of the Puma deal and an incredible 35 different home, away, third and limited edition shirts in 12 seas</em>ons, the club <strong>HAS </strong>to take the fans opinions in account. Why aren’t they asked what they like? After all, they’re the ones who will be wearing it!</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.epltalk.com/wp-content/uploads/flickr.com/files/2009/06/new_kit_0910.jpg" alt="new kit 0910 Tottenham Hotspur Face New Kit Backlash" width="489" height="212" title="Tottenham Hotspur Face New Kit Backlash" /></p>
<p>Will the club listen? It does seem as if a ground swell of support is building, which includes boycotting all three of the kits unless the home strip is changed, though hopefully we’ll not see a repeat of the Athletico Madrid fans, who firebombed the club shop because Nike changed the stripes to halves. I suppose it’s all down to money, but it would be nice if Tottenham’s chairman, Daniel Levy, actually came out, admit they’ve got this very wrong and try and rectify it. Just change the yellow trim to blue and hey presto! Nice kit.</p>
<h3><strong>Pre-Order The New Tottenham Home Kit Today</strong></h3>
<p>Pre-order the new home Tottenham Hotspur shirt or kit today so you’ll be the first to get it. <a href="http://scripts.affiliatefuture.com/AFClick.asp?affiliateID=36679&amp;merchantID=791&amp;programmeID=2461&amp;mediaID=0&amp;tracking=&amp;url=http://www.kitbag.com/stores/kitbag_4_5/products/kit_selector.aspx?pid=56159" target="_blank">UK residents can order here through Kitbag</a>, while <a href="http://scripts.affiliatefuture.com/AFClick.asp?affiliateID=30305&amp;merchantID=2544&amp;programmeID=7010&amp;mediaID=0&amp;tracking=&amp;url=http://www.kitbag.com/stores/kitbag_4_5/products/kit_selector.aspx?pid=56159&amp;cur=USD" target="_blank">US residents can order here, through Kitbag USA</a>.</p>
<h3>Related Posts:</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="../epl-talk-podcast/alan-mullery-interview/" target="_blank">Interview with Alan Mullery</a>,</li>
<li><a href="../epl-talk-podcast/epl-talk-podcast-white-hart-lane-emirates-stadium/" target="_blank">Journey from America to White Hart Lane</a>,</li>
<li><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/epltalk/sets/72157594388178725/" target="_blank">Photo slideshow Of pilgrimage to White Hart Lane</a>,</li>
<li><a href="../tottenham-hotspur-home-away-and-third-football-kits-for-0910-season-official-photos/8611" target="_blank">Official Photographs of Tottenham Home, Away and Third Shirts For 09/10 Season</a>.</li>
</ul>
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.718 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-26 07:28:13 -->

