12 Responses

  1. Stuart
    Stuart
    December 2, 2009 at 9:33 pm | | Reply


    I know the bigger teams usually get the rub of the green but this is ridiculous – newspapers trying to alter an entire match cause the smooth silky southerers (whom they support) were out battled by the poor northerners (who all live in huts according to them). We may get a fairer write up now no London teams are left.

    Good spot just don’t let Sepp Blatter hear about the result – he will send the Men in Black round to erase everyones memory and put Chelsea through.

    Come on Rovers

  2. iZy®
    iZy®
    December 2, 2009 at 9:42 pm | | Reply


    hahahaha….chelsea were desperate for the win they sent on drogba haha….well done blackburn hope you beat villa also to meet united in the final and lose….but kudos to the rover

  3. dave
    dave
    December 2, 2009 at 9:45 pm | | Reply


    also says in the article that kalou stroked the ball past henrique hilario for his goal even though that’s chelsea’s own goalkeeper.
    he stroked it past paul robinson.

  4. dave
    dave
    December 2, 2009 at 9:46 pm | | Reply


    chelsea played extra-time and half the 2nd half with 10 men after kalou went off injured.

  5. Scott
    Scott
    December 2, 2009 at 9:53 pm | | Reply


    @ Dave. That’s what Chelsea get for subbing 3 players at HT. Now why would they do that? Because Rovers ran them all over the park.

  6. Stuart
    Stuart
    December 2, 2009 at 10:07 pm | | Reply


    How come this guy is wrong on everything but knows exactly how many goals Dogruff has for the season.

  7. Stuart
    Stuart
    December 2, 2009 at 10:16 pm | | Reply


    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/league_cup/8387299.stm

    Proof of the conspiracy against Blackburn continues, the BBC are reporting Kakuta’s penalty was saved by guess who Hilario. We don’t even get credit for penny saves.

  8. coachie ballgames
    December 2, 2009 at 10:21 pm | | Reply


    mayhaps the editors were distracted in their haste to get the bikini photos correct.

    sucked that the match was not broadcast.

  9. Elliott
    December 3, 2009 at 11:58 am | | Reply


    This just shows the limits of the printing paper/deadline model of journalism – I’m sure this writer felt pressure to produce a story before the match ended. Conversely, on the blogosphere and online publication deadlines are based on when a story breaks, not the break of dawn.

  10. vinnie
    vinnie
    December 6, 2009 at 11:35 pm | | Reply


    is it just me or the bikini babe at the top is all i can see? =/

  11. dave.armitage
    dave.armitage
    November 14, 2011 at 12:48 pm | | Reply


    I have only just stumbled across this website and admit to being extremely disturbed by this. I would order someone to take it off and all that rigmarole, but it seems pointless. I am the Dave Armitage referred to in this article and can tell you one thing for absolute sure – I wasn’t at that game. Whether a by-line has been wrongly attributed to it, I don’t know, but I was NOT at that game. I tend to cover the Midlands patch and have done for over 30 years during which my integrity or accuracy has only rarely been called into question(everyone’s does occasionally!). Occasionally I go ‘off-patch’ but it is so rare I would remember going to this particular game. I can’t explain what has happened here, but definitely not me folks!!

Leave a Reply