Comments on: Time For West Ham To Pay Up And Shut Up http://www.epltalk.com/time-for-west-ham-to-pay-up-and-shut-up/3295 Daily News & Analysis of the English Premier League Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:03:19 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: GRANT http://www.epltalk.com/time-for-west-ham-to-pay-up-and-shut-up/3295#comment-26852 GRANT Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:01:52 +0000 http://www.epltalk.com/time-for-west-ham-to-pay-up-and-shut-up/3295#comment-26852 they were registered , but not properly <br>thats why the first tribunal said they lied, they said they were owned by west ham ,but this was untrue <br>thats the bit that broke the rules <br>as it was a lie it rendered their registration null and void <br><br>its like saying your fully employed applying for a visa card when your not they were registered , but not properly
thats why the first tribunal said they lied, they said they were owned by west ham ,but this was untrue
thats the bit that broke the rules
as it was a lie it rendered their registration null and void

its like saying your fully employed applying for a visa card when your not

]]> By: CA http://www.epltalk.com/time-for-west-ham-to-pay-up-and-shut-up/3295#comment-25303 CA Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:55:44 +0000 http://www.epltalk.com/time-for-west-ham-to-pay-up-and-shut-up/3295#comment-25303 Stumbled on this site and have never read anything so ridiculous... Gaffer, if that's what you call yourself. Get you facts straight, Tevez was never deemed ineligible and if you don't believe me read it from the horses mouth. This excerpt is from a letter sent to all Premier League Clubs from The Premier League. :<br><br>"The Charges <br>West Ham United were charged under Rule B13 which requires each Club to behave towards each other Club and the League with the utmost good faith and also with a breach of Rule U18 reproduced here in full: “No Club shall enter into a contract which enables any other party to that contract to acquire the ability materially to influence its policies or the performance of its teams in League Matches or in any of the competitions set out in Rule E10.” <br><br>At no point were West Ham United charged with playing an ineligible player – both Tevez and Mascherano were registered on 31 August. All the required documentation was received by the Premier League and the usual confirmations received and sent – a process you are all very familiar with. Registration is definitive as to the status of the player. At no time has Mr Tevez’s registration been revoked or terminated and at all times he has been eligible to play for West Ham."<br><br>There you go. Look forward to a summons for libel landing on your doormat! Stumbled on this site and have never read anything so ridiculous… Gaffer, if that's what you call yourself. Get you facts straight, Tevez was never deemed ineligible and if you don't believe me read it from the horses mouth. This excerpt is from a letter sent to all Premier League Clubs from The Premier League. :

“The Charges
West Ham United were charged under Rule B13 which requires each Club to behave towards each other Club and the League with the utmost good faith and also with a breach of Rule U18 reproduced here in full: “No Club shall enter into a contract which enables any other party to that contract to acquire the ability materially to influence its policies or the performance of its teams in League Matches or in any of the competitions set out in Rule E10.”

At no point were West Ham United charged with playing an ineligible player – both Tevez and Mascherano were registered on 31 August. All the required documentation was received by the Premier League and the usual confirmations received and sent – a process you are all very familiar with. Registration is definitive as to the status of the player. At no time has Mr Tevez’s registration been revoked or terminated and at all times he has been eligible to play for West Ham.”

There you go. Look forward to a summons for libel landing on your doormat!

]]> By: Chris http://www.epltalk.com/time-for-west-ham-to-pay-up-and-shut-up/3295#comment-23906 Chris Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:20:44 +0000 http://www.epltalk.com/time-for-west-ham-to-pay-up-and-shut-up/3295#comment-23906 Tevez played during the first half of the season and was just as much a part of the team's failure at that time as in the their successful last few weeks. Maybe the the role of Tevez in the turmiol at that time cost the team 6 points, or 9 points. No one can possibly say, just as no one can possibly say that West Ham would have been relegated without Tevez.<br><br>The successful part of the season came after the club had been fined by the league and told that he was allowed to play. I don't hear anyone complaining about the league who, if Tevez was ineligible in the last couple of months, should ultimately be responsible for compensation to Sheffield; such an error would be theirs. Tevez played during the first half of the season and was just as much a part of the team's failure at that time as in the their successful last few weeks. Maybe the the role of Tevez in the turmiol at that time cost the team 6 points, or 9 points. No one can possibly say, just as no one can possibly say that West Ham would have been relegated without Tevez.

The successful part of the season came after the club had been fined by the league and told that he was allowed to play. I don't hear anyone complaining about the league who, if Tevez was ineligible in the last couple of months, should ultimately be responsible for compensation to Sheffield; such an error would be theirs.

]]> By: Patrick http://www.epltalk.com/time-for-west-ham-to-pay-up-and-shut-up/3295#comment-23460 Patrick Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:11:59 +0000 http://www.epltalk.com/time-for-west-ham-to-pay-up-and-shut-up/3295#comment-23460 I still can't get over the title of this post... I still can't get over the title of this post…

]]> By: Patrick http://www.epltalk.com/time-for-west-ham-to-pay-up-and-shut-up/3295#comment-23446 Patrick Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:35:59 +0000 http://www.epltalk.com/time-for-west-ham-to-pay-up-and-shut-up/3295#comment-23446 Gaffer you realize that you just don't have a full grasp of this complicated situation. and you are playing McCain type semantics. The reason SUFC sued was the games after the fine that Tevez played. When he is fact was a registered WHU footballer cleared to play by the powers that be. The question was not the fine or the punishment because that is against FA rules. It was after it was found that some of the paperwork former owner Brown submitted left off that MSI had a controlling ownership of the players. So again this is about after the fine. Understand that now??? The fine was the punishment, which under league law team can't sue over or go to arbitration or whatever.<br><br>SUFC's McCabe also was very vocal that this wasn't about money, yet it was ALWAYS about the money wasn't it. Do the other relegated teams get a share since this is based on what ifs? <br><br>and West Ham will not have to sell players. That is just absurd. if the amount is huge WHU will sue Brown and the EPL, since Tevez was played with full clearance of the FA. You may remember Wigan where very vocal back then when he was cleared and they had some sort of council to make sure everything was legal. It was so said the League and the FA. <br><br><br>But if you live in a black and white world and want to call West Ham cheats simply out of spite - whatever that's your own issue. Cause its not on facts.<br><br>You sound about as intelligent as a Millwall supporter discussing West Ham in this post. Gaffer you realize that you just don't have a full grasp of this complicated situation. and you are playing McCain type semantics. The reason SUFC sued was the games after the fine that Tevez played. When he is fact was a registered WHU footballer cleared to play by the powers that be. The question was not the fine or the punishment because that is against FA rules. It was after it was found that some of the paperwork former owner Brown submitted left off that MSI had a controlling ownership of the players. So again this is about after the fine. Understand that now??? The fine was the punishment, which under league law team can't sue over or go to arbitration or whatever.

SUFC's McCabe also was very vocal that this wasn't about money, yet it was ALWAYS about the money wasn't it. Do the other relegated teams get a share since this is based on what ifs?

and West Ham will not have to sell players. That is just absurd. if the amount is huge WHU will sue Brown and the EPL, since Tevez was played with full clearance of the FA. You may remember Wigan where very vocal back then when he was cleared and they had some sort of council to make sure everything was legal. It was so said the League and the FA.

But if you live in a black and white world and want to call West Ham cheats simply out of spite – whatever that's your own issue. Cause its not on facts.

You sound about as intelligent as a Millwall supporter discussing West Ham in this post.

]]>