2 Responses

  1. brn442
    brn442
    June 27, 2009 at 12:50 am | | Reply


    The demands of modern club football make it almost impossible for managers to experiment with any real variation of “total football”. The current game seems to have made the division of labour on the pitch almost absolute, or has it? Whilst I’m always amused when the pundits act as though it’s a different code of football when a centre-half is told to play as an emergency full back during a match, one can argue that e.g. the modern striker is expected to do much more defensive and link up play than his predecessor 20 years ago. Ian Rush probably would have had to do much more than “defend from the front” if he were playing today.
    Managers paradoxically appreciate players’ versatility in desperate times but then frown on it as an unnecessary luxury, expect them to revert and then rigidly adhere to arguably their less favored roles (as per Gerrard & Rooney) when it’s not “needed.” Hopefully, like the 70’s Dutch, someone will be bold enough to try total or as I say ”pure” football – where, as in the sport’s beginning, the collective objective of all eleven men will be to put the ball in the back of the net.

  2. Benny
    Benny
    June 27, 2009 at 1:53 am | | Reply


    The Undefeated Arsenal team of 2003/04 was total football. Watch a DVD back of that season. Its mind blowing. Henry, Bergkamp and Pires. Incredible.

Leave a Reply